Some to talk thing.
In the waking months of Gordon Browns control on a united kingdom there really has been nothing but a few words in multiple newspapers reguarding the state of affairs in both the UK and the deteoriating world around us, untill now when Prime Minister Gordon Brown has flew al the way to the united states of america to back up the words and threats of a unatimately disrespected politician.
In all honesty I did coil and curse in confusion as I heard the news that our Newly appointed know it all had been seen and heard bending over infront of a government that feels like a war o something or someone every few years. I ask you, as a person who reads this you are obiously concerned for the state of lives that come under the fire of a war on a country that dsent really own any of the immediae publics concers anymore.
In the press junket both gorden brown and gorge w bush are quoted in saying,probably in handheld unison, that they would be "Working together on a number of global isues". These prestergous issues include Iraq, Iran and afganistan, yes the things we have been hearing about for the past five years. What about moments and concerns that have been effecting us, people who live in the idealisting world they wish to create. Topics like global warming, and climate change or human rights issues in the middle east sould be of a higher concern to people who can help do something about it. To be honest there is no need to back up an air strike for no apparent reason, as far as I, and I meaning we the less politically minded population of both the UK and the USA, we are playing a game of tag, but instead of tapping our worldly neighbours we seem to find it more effective if we commit heaious acts of extreme violience against eachother while at the same time try to come up with some moral for destroying entire citys of lives and buildings.
As I undertand george W Bush quoted that the "concquences of failre in Iraq would be a disaster in the United States". Now first of this statement only supports the decisions and opinions of people who are against the war on terror in a sense. It would be a diaster for the government at this particular time, this would mean giving up spending hours recruting young and witless young people who believe that taking the lives of nameless forginers is a game that can be played for country and eceonmy, only to be abandoned by another contries opinion.
There will be some contradiction within this opinion, but in all honesty there is contradiction in all arguments ad opinions.
Paul James
In all honesty I did coil and curse in confusion as I heard the news that our Newly appointed know it all had been seen and heard bending over infront of a government that feels like a war o something or someone every few years. I ask you, as a person who reads this you are obiously concerned for the state of lives that come under the fire of a war on a country that dsent really own any of the immediae publics concers anymore.
In the press junket both gorden brown and gorge w bush are quoted in saying,probably in handheld unison, that they would be "Working together on a number of global isues". These prestergous issues include Iraq, Iran and afganistan, yes the things we have been hearing about for the past five years. What about moments and concerns that have been effecting us, people who live in the idealisting world they wish to create. Topics like global warming, and climate change or human rights issues in the middle east sould be of a higher concern to people who can help do something about it. To be honest there is no need to back up an air strike for no apparent reason, as far as I, and I meaning we the less politically minded population of both the UK and the USA, we are playing a game of tag, but instead of tapping our worldly neighbours we seem to find it more effective if we commit heaious acts of extreme violience against eachother while at the same time try to come up with some moral for destroying entire citys of lives and buildings.
As I undertand george W Bush quoted that the "concquences of failre in Iraq would be a disaster in the United States". Now first of this statement only supports the decisions and opinions of people who are against the war on terror in a sense. It would be a diaster for the government at this particular time, this would mean giving up spending hours recruting young and witless young people who believe that taking the lives of nameless forginers is a game that can be played for country and eceonmy, only to be abandoned by another contries opinion.
There will be some contradiction within this opinion, but in all honesty there is contradiction in all arguments ad opinions.
Paul James
posted by cahilljpaul | 06:05
|
0 Comments
